Archive for March, 2008

Hillary Clinton: Sexist?

Add a comment

Hillary says that she won’t be “bullied out” of the race for the White House, saying that the “big boys” - such as Senators Chris Dodd and Pat Leahy and Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico, who are all key Obama allies - are trying to push her out of the Democratic race because she is a woman. But when asked whether Barak Obama could beat John McCain in the presidential election, she said:

I’m saying I have a better chance. You cannot as a Democrat win the White House without a very big women’s vote. What I believe is that women will turn out for me.

So… she thinks that women would - or should - vote for her because she is a woman too? Rather patronising, really. Women, just like men, vote for someone because they like their policies. They’re not going to vote for anyone just because they have a pair of tits and lack a penis, like they do.

Just think if a man was to say that, replacing the word “women” with “men”. Or even if Obama was to say the same phrase just using the word “black” instead. There would immediately be an outcry against it. And the same should apply to Hillary Clinton over this.

I admire the way that Barack Obama has not playing the “I’m black, so vote for me” line. He has made it quite clear that he is about representing everyone who shares his views, not just his race or gender - but everyone.

With this phrase - and her continuous “mis-speaking” - Hillary Clinton has shown herself not fit to be a Presidential candidate.

A Disability Treaty

Add a comment

Should the UK adopt a new United Nations treaty on disabilities?

The government has been urged by a charity to ratify fully an international treaty on disability.

Yet another external treaty to cover internal issues!

In 2007, the UK became one of the first countries to sign the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities after it was agreed.

Nice of them to let us know, wasn’t it?

But the disability charity Scope said it was worried ministers may opt out of parts of the treaty, including the right not to live in an institution…
Countries that adopt the treaty will have to get rid of laws, customs and practices that discriminate against disabled people.
The convention sets out the rights of disabled people, covering civil and political rights, accessibility, participation and inclusion, education, health, employment and social protection.
Scope says this treaty could do a lot to improve the rights of Britain’s 11 million disabled people - but only if the government ratifies all of it.

Don’t we already have laws to prevent discrimination against disabled people and to protect their rights? Such as this. Does it not cover everything? It certainly appears pretty comprehensive to me. So why do we to sign up to yet another externally-created treaty?

It is far better than any such laws are made in our Parliament and discussed properly by our elected representatives, and tailored specifically to fit the UK situation. Then it can be modified to take account of the way in which our society works as needed. Rather than it being impossible to modify it.

Image: The FAIL Blog

Add a comment
House prices are falling.
Home owners could see 25 per cent wiped off the value of their properties within two years, a leading economist has warned…
The prediction came as a property market survey found house prices were falling in more than a quarter of the post codes in the country…
It is the sixth month in a row that house prices have fallen and they are now falling in 28.8 per cent of all postcodes across the country. (The Telegraph)

On an entirely selfish note, all I can say is: Perfect! 2010 is about when I am planning to enter the housing market, so the more house prices, all the better for me.

The Weekly Blog Posts - Sunday, March 30 2008

Add a comment


There’s no Weekly Blog Posts this week. I haven’t had the time [or, frankly, the inclination] this week to keep up with blogs.

It’ll be back next week.

The Truth And The Internet

2 Comments

Art by Sean Bonner, released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 license.

The French Connection

Add a comment

When The ThunderDragon asked me if I’d consider posting a weekly guest post at weekends, when the news is (theoretically) quieter and there’s less to talk about, I asked if there was anything particular theme to stick by - or if I could just “go off on one”. I was told I could just go off on one - which is potentially a dangerous thing to say.

Thankfully, as a committed Francophile (I even spent an entire year over there), there’s been one major piece of news this week that’s warranted comment. Yes, the visit of the Bombastic diminutive drunk (You’ve probably seen those clips before - I’ve mentioned them myself on occasion - but they’re still worth it) and his Supermodel wife.

It’s a story that’s really generated a lot of attention. Well, at least Mme Bruni Sarkozy has. The French press has reacted with surprise at how a former model turned singer is being plastered over every single paper - Le Parisien even referring to us English being “conquered” by Carli in an operation of seduction by the Presidential couple.

Either way though, it’s fair to say that the state visit has strengthened Anglo-Franco relations to the general public. We’ve always had a love-hate relationship with our neighbours across La Manche.

There seems to be a myth that they’re lazy, always on strike/protesting, arrogant, rude, and stinking of garlic.
I wouldn’t say the stereotypes are completely wrong. Even I was on strike for 6 weeks when I was over there as students protested over the Contrat première embauche, and you could find dates of public transport strikes pre-printed in your diary.
But lazy and arrogant? No - they’re just different. I’m presently reading Sixty Million Frenchmen Can’t be Wrong, which explains the French culture by showing the history behind it all, so we can understand why the French are like they are.

Best example - we may think they’re arrogant because they don’t introduce themselves at the start of a conversation. However, they take the view - what’s in a name? It’s very easy to strike up a conversation with a random Frenchie. It’s far from unknown to be invited into someone’s house and share an aperitif. But, they don’t want to know about you - there’s no implicit ‘one-upmanship’ with the “So, what do you do?” that exists in the UK.

And yes, there’s a 35hour maximum working week. We’ve contracted out of that EU directive, and we’re not allowed to work more than an average of 48 hours a week. I don’t think that makes them lazy. I think it’s healthy. One of the main reasons I didn’t want to work in the City is that I wanted private time. I could be set to earn a much bigger salary if I did; but I like the 9-5, occasionally working extra hours here and there where required. Not leaving my desk at 2am in the morning because I’m too exhausted to carry on. The French are insisting on this so everyone is allowed to enjoy their free time. What’s wrong with that?

In my year spent as a ex-pat, I learnt how to embrace the French culture - and, critically, how to deal with the ‘arrogant’ French on their own level. With this, I think there’s a lot of advantages, and would leave to bring some of it over the Channel. It won’t happen, but I hope that the visit of M. & Mme. “Sarko” has shown people that they’re not that bad over there after all…

Asp

A Couple Of Headlines

Add a comment

Sometimes you read headlines and can’t help but think “WTF?” A couple of these were around today:

MoD admit human rights breach” [as it appeared on the website link, rather than on the page itself]. I mean, surely a “breach” is a bit of an understatement in regards to this abuse of a human being which resulted in his death. A “breach” is when you step over the line. This is well and trying smashing right through it.

‘Too many women’ dying from cancer“. You don’t say. Any death from cancer is too many. But also, what about the men that die from cancer? Is there just about the right number of men dying from cancer, or do men simply not count as people?

When you read these headlines, you just have to ask what the hell was going through the mind of the person who wrote it?

UPDATE: This one has appeared as the BBCs main headline today:

T5 chaos ‘not BA’s finest hour’“. Well duh. Anything that can be described as “chaos” is hardly going to be any organisations “finest hour”, is it? Idiots. Way to go stating the bloody obvious.

Add a comment
Gordon Brown did what he was told.

He got lost.

Now, if only he’d do what we tell him to do and fuck off.

The Doctor Is Back In The TARDIS!

1 Comment

Series 4 of the new Doctor Who is starting very very soon! Saturday 5 April at 6.20pm. Just over a week away.

I can’t wait! It looks so so so good! All of the new series companions are back Donna [from the Christmas Special before last], Martha, and even Rose! It’s so close, and I just can’t wait.

The series 4 trailer is fantastic. Watch it below:

Wasting Police Time

2 Comments

I can’t help but think that this would just be a waste of police time. We pay the police to do this for us. To know and understand the problems in a community and to deal with it. It may well sound good to say:

Every community of the country is going to have neighbourhood policing with police to call upon - with their mobile phone number available - to be able to call them up and have local meetings to discuss the local issues you’re concerned about…
That will lead to neighbourhood contracts, where local residents and police come together to decide ‘here are the priorities, this is what we’ve got to do, this is how we can make it a safer place’.

But in reality, it’s a load of bollocks.

The police already know - or damn well should know - what the crime problems are in any given area. Giving out mobile numbers of police officers won’t help anything, except distract them from their actual job of dealing with crime even more than the current target-focused policing that this government has introduced. It is just a waste of police time.

Nevertheless, a greater level of contact between local police forces and local communities is desirable - but on a more manageable and less of a free-for-all basis. Such as, maybe, monthly meetings when residents can give their thoughts on crime issues to a local police force?

But one thing which would certainly enable more police to be communicating with local residents would be through reducing the ridiculous number of targets that they are expected to meet and the amount of paperwork that they are required to fill out foe every little thing, thus enabling them to actually patrol the streets in the way that we expect them to and come in to contact with the community that way.

As David Davis said: “The public want [the police] on the streets, not on the phone.”