<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flawed in 42 ways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/2008/07/flawed-in-42-ways.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/2008/07/flawed-in-42-ways.html</link>
	<description>Don't annoy a dragon, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: When Is The Dead Not Dead? at The ThunderDragon</title>
		<link>http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/2008/07/flawed-in-42-ways.html#comment-3620</link>
		<dc:creator>When Is The Dead Not Dead? at The ThunderDragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/2008/07/flawed-in-42-ways.html#comment-3620</guid>
		<description>[...] It may be the answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything, but it&#8217;s not the answer to this. And the Lords have voted it down by 309 to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It may be the answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything, but it&#8217;s not the answer to this. And the Lords have voted it down by 309 to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garbo</title>
		<link>http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/2008/07/flawed-in-42-ways.html#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>Garbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/2008/07/flawed-in-42-ways.html#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>This has very little if nothing to do with Davis’s actions. The Bill was always going to receive a frosty reception in the Lords. If anything, this backs up the assumption that what Davis did was miscalculated - he should have left it to the Lords and then himself as a future Home Secretary to sort out.

Unfortunately his action became bigger than the issue.

Remember - I am not saying that what Davis did was wrong in principle, I am saying what he did has not worked.

If he returns to parliament (as I am sure he will) next week, it will almost certainly be with less people having voted for him. From then on he will be a thorn, not an asset, in Cameron’s side. And all for making very little difference - if anything he smothered the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has very little if nothing to do with Davis’s actions. The Bill was always going to receive a frosty reception in the Lords. If anything, this backs up the assumption that what Davis did was miscalculated - he should have left it to the Lords and then himself as a future Home Secretary to sort out.</p>
<p>Unfortunately his action became bigger than the issue.</p>
<p>Remember - I am not saying that what Davis did was wrong in principle, I am saying what he did has not worked.</p>
<p>If he returns to parliament (as I am sure he will) next week, it will almost certainly be with less people having voted for him. From then on he will be a thorn, not an asset, in Cameron’s side. And all for making very little difference - if anything he smothered the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/2008/07/flawed-in-42-ways.html#comment-3079</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thethunderdragon.co.uk/2008/07/flawed-in-42-ways.html#comment-3079</guid>
		<description>People seem to have completely ignored the appalling quality of the legislation itself which, as she pointed out, makes this whole situation totally impractical.

But why won't Cameron commit to reversing the decision?

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People seem to have completely ignored the appalling quality of the legislation itself which, as she pointed out, makes this whole situation totally impractical.</p>
<p>But why won&#8217;t Cameron commit to reversing the decision?</p>
<p><a href="http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
