Archive for the 'Honours' Category

Olympic honours

1 Comment

beijing-olympics-gold-medalOn my way back from V2008 last Tuesday, I listened to BBC 5Live to ensure I caught the final day of action from the Velodrome (and Chris Hoy’s historic hat-trick). Inbetween the updates from the Madison, there was the standard phone-in, notably people responding to suggestions that double gold-medal winner Becky Adlington should become Dame Rebecca - as Cassie Patten suggested live to the masses.

That morning, Dame Kelly Holmes had said that, in her opinion, Adlington isn’t ready for such an honour. But, as a lot of people were keen to point out - she became a Dame after a double victory. Is it just sour grapes?

Well, I generally feel that the honours system has been seriously devalued. Entire teams getting honours doesn’t value individual achievements. Especially when they get it for winning a single tournament that happens every 18 months.

There’s no doubt that most (if not all) of Team GBs gold medal winners deserve some recognition in form of honours. However, it’s about time we looked at the honours differently.

Honours should be a final achievement. The cherry on the top of a wonderful career - the hallmark of an amazing achievement. “Dame Kelly” as she’s known was given her honour at the end of her career, after a succession of international medals - the pinnacle of which came at Athens. Adlington is at the start of her career.

If we gave Adlington a Damehood now, what would we give her in 4 years time if she continues her success? The throne itself? And what about Chris Hoy with three golds at these games; or Ben Ainslie with 3 successive golds (an achievement Jacques Rogge today rated as good as Michael Phelps given the potentional number of medals available at each games)? Maybe a Duchy each?!

And from another angle - the stars themselves already have some reward - the silverware hanging around their necks. If anyone deserves an honour from these games, I’m going to suggest Shane Sutton (and Dave Brailsford MBE (yes, he’s got something already), as well as others in the British Cycling Team. You might not know the games - but without them Team GB might well have 7 gold medals fewer than they do at the minute…

Whilst the honours system should, erm, honour Britain’s greats - it should be especailly used for the ‘unsung’ heroes. Such as the lollypop lady who’s been helping kids cross the road for 30 years, rain or shine. And, regardless of the final medals tally, let’s not use the Beijing successes to look popular and trendy by giving honours again.

~Asp

The Northern Monkey is turning even more Northern next week, as he moves house. Until internet is established, there’ll obviously be no guest column. As the world breaths a huge sigh of relief…

Tycoon Refused Lordship Offers Brown Money

1 Comment

One of Labour’s most prominent backers, who vowed not to donate any more money after being dragged into the cash-for-honours inquiry, is prepared to fund a Gordon Brown-led general election campaign.
Sir Gulam Noon, the food tycoon whose nomination for a peerage was blocked after he was advised by Labour not to declare a £250,000 loan, has told The Times that he may convert the loan into a donation after being impressed by the new Prime Minister…
His nomination was blocked because he omitted the loan from his form. The police interviewed Sir Gulam twice under caution as they tried to establish whether there had been a conspiracy to sell honours. (The Times)

I wonder if this will be in return for another shot at getting a “K or a big P“?

Add a comment
The problem with giving honours to “unsung heroes” is that as soon as you have given them it, they are no longer “unsung heroes” but, for the lack of a better phrase, sung heroes.

It’s all well and good to want to give a “substantially higher” number of honours for community work, beyond the current 40%, but there are (a) only so many people who have done 20 years as a lollipop lady or something, and (b) the people who do this sort of community work tend to be the sort who don’t want or need this sort of “honour”.