Archive for the 'Nadine Dorries' Category

20 Weeks

Add a comment

ImageAbortion is one of those tricky issues. Women must have the right to abort. This choice is essential. Anything else would just be barbaric. But then we must also consider medical advances which allow babies to survive at far earlier stages than ever before. This is particularly pertinent to me, as I was born 10 weeks premature 23 years ago, and had I been born not very many years beforehand, I would have almost certainly died at birth. Which, rather obviously, from my viewpoint would have been rather a bad thing.

As such, we need to attempt to balance the two as best as possible. A woman’s right to choose and the ability of medical science.

As such, I agree with Dr Crippen when he says:

Dr Crippen is in favour of reducing the abortion foetal age limit from 24 to 20 weeks - save only for catastrophic foetal abnormality and genuine threat to the mother’s life. I could not contemplate facilitating an abortion at, say, 23 weeks for purely social reasons.

So why will I not be jumping on the Nadine Dorries bandwagon?

Nadine is a right-wing Conservative, a Christian, a divorcee with three children and, rather implausibly, Iain Dale’s theatre going mate. She is an ex-nurse and successful business woman. She is one of the very few MPs who openly publishes details of her parliamentary expenses on her blog and, whatever else you may say about her, you have to admire her for that. I wish she could be as honest about the abortion debate as she is about her expenses.

And there lies the problem… she will not let the truth, including the scientific truth, stand in her way.

Nadine’s bandwagon is, of course, her new “the 20 weeks campaign“, which appears to make most of its points with pictures and videos. Pictures and videos do not make a case - neither does the Q&A page, which is hardly a fountain of knowledge and information.

Whilst I support the idea reducing abortions to 20 weeks except for extreme cases, I cannot condone her campaign, especially when Dr Crippen also points out that Nadine appears to be against abortion altogether, from her past comments.

Any reduction in the abortion time period must be made alongside extra funding to ensure that all women get the opportunity to see a doctor about abortions and get them done in a very prompt manner. It should not be rushed, but it must not be delayed.

So - Yes to 20 weeks, No to Nadine Dorries’ campaign.

When Is A Blog Not A Blog?

3 Comments

When it doesn’t have any comments.

Nadine Dorries has turned off the comment facility on her blog, saying:

I am no longer going to post comments on my blog.
Please don’t send any more comments - It’s a time thing, I don’t have any.
I have to rely on the patience of others to read and post the comments for me. I am never in front of a computer for more than a couple of minutes at a time and this has now made reading the comments before they are posted impossible.
Knowing that there are comments on my site which I may not even have had time to see, makes me uncomfortable…

Well, she’s utterly wrong to do so. A blog is a conversation. Without the comments, it’s nothing more than a speech. That is makes her “uncomfortable” not to have seen the comments on her blog is no argument for turning them off. It is the very nature of the internet!

She ends the announcement with the comment:

I will continue to blog each day as I can do that on the run!!

Yet without comments, it’s not a blog. Simple as that. Without comments it is not a blog and you are not a blogger. The ability to comment is the very lifeblood of a blog, without it it is nothing really. A recipe missing a vital ingredient, a perfume without any scent - pretty damn pointless.

Without comments, is it - can it be - a blog? Short answer: no.

Image: Nadine Dorries